Both characters should be mature and ethical enough to understand that. They wanting to be together wouldn't be a morally justified reason to alter the natural course of the time-line of an entire alternate universe. Since that would arguably affect the natural course of time for the other people in that alternate reality, without any arguably justified or moral cause like bringing back the people Thanos snapped. However, even if both agreed to the relationship, that would still arguably be an unethical thing to do from both sides. It should also be noted that Clint freed Wanda from the Avengers compound in addition to aiding Steve Rogers in violation of the Accords, which stands as reason to believe Clint would receive a much longer sentence.Īt the end Captain America starts a relationship with an alternate version of Agent Carter, an important person in SHIELD. It was never specifically stated what Clint's sentence was when he was placed on house arrest. If Clint and Scott were charged with the same crime, and given the same sentence, then their sentences should have ended at the same time, which means that Clint should have had his ankle tracker removed before the snap.
However, in this movie, Clint is still wearing his ankle tracker right at the time of the snap.
In Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018), Scott's house arrest sentence ended quite a bit of time before Thanos snapped his fingers. (at around 20 secs) In Avengers: Infinity War (2018), it was mentioned that both Clint Barton (Hawkeye) and Scott Lang (Ant-Man) were placed under house arrest because they chose to return home to their families rather than join Steve Rogers in exile.
0 kommentar(er)
